Map's Navigation Network - XC_PathsWorker & MapGarbage support

Development assistance and tutorials here.
Post Reply
Nelsona
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:03 am

Map's Navigation Network - XC_PathsWorker & MapGarbage support

Post by Nelsona »

Audience: People able to understand what is needed in a navigation network for artificial intelligence (Bots, Monsters).
_________________________________
We start with a test.

Whoever is not capable of understanding the two pictures below (bugs shown), there is no need to waste time with reading what is explained further.
Glacier_bug1.PNG
Glacier_bug1.PNG (1.11 MiB) Viewed 5884 times
Glacier_bug2.PNG
Glacier_bug2.PNG (988.74 KiB) Viewed 5884 times
The Start:
I took as an example a messed up map, CTF-Glacier][-CE105. We have a problem at accessing flag, both flags more exactly.

Another problem is common even nowadays not only in the past, combinations of special points, so-called COMBOS.
The shown combination is not just wrong using LiftCenter instead of TranslocDest, but it is a blind way that does not go anywhere. Perhaps a Bot who is close to LiftCenter will somehow be able to follow an enemy using this path, but the chances are quite minimal.

The first problem that does not help us is this unnecessary agglomeration of navigation paths because all the time the Engine calculates the shortest path, the other adjacent paths are almost all the time without utility.

XC_PathsWorker has the ability to create simpler navigation paths, better visible to the human eye, it helps us to see what is missing and where it is missing. When there are fewer data, the process is running faster, and the map reduces its dimensions.

However, in the current context, not even our tool won't do navigation paths to flags because they are placed upper, and somehow pushed at the wall.

We first start adjusting the location on the Z axis with 40 UU lowered - for FlagBase actor(s).
The data entered for the production of navigation paths is as follows:
- scanning radius around a point - 600 UU;
- internal paths limit - 4 out of 16 - 4 directions/4 connections;
- the size of the agglomeration with objects pickups - 20 UU - BunchSize;
- we choose large sizes for paths - bTryMonsterMode - True;
- we do not keep the old navigation network - bKeepOldPaths - False;
- PlayerStart actors are not excepted - bAvoidStarts - False.
Hit BUILD.
Glacier_Recover1.PNG
Glacier_Recover1.PNG (1.01 MiB) Viewed 5881 times
The result is positive, we have a navigation path as an entry to the flag.
Now we climb the flag back to its original place. Even if the path does not seem too valid, FlagBase has a large collision cylinder that is enough to do its job when artificial intelligence touches it, even if our Bot fails to get to the center of this target point.
Glacier_Recover2.PNG
Glacier_Recover2.PNG (1.13 MiB) Viewed 5878 times
In an ordinary situation, a navigation node in this way can cause loop movements, but in this situation there is no problem because the route will be changed when the flag is taken.
At this moment we select FlagBase and examine what connections it has with the rest of the navigation network. The path to the flag seems wider than the path that comes from the flag, however, both are valid and can be used normally.
Glacier_Recover3.PNG
Glacier_Recover3.PNG (989.34 KiB) Viewed 5878 times
Why did I specify in the blue color a generic medium path ? Because this XC_PathsWorker goes with the dimensions of a navigation path of up to 117 × 112 UU aiming to ensure navigation by all the creatures from UT's stock.
The problem with the flags-goals is solved, but here we have some issues to be taken into account. Anyone trying to edit the map, it will only bring the original errors back into the stage - no path to Flag (both Flags) - due to the new map design.

Instead of having 7451 paths / REACHSPECS, we do have under 2000 - taking into consideration that there might be a need for small additions. We must not forget that an over-crowded navigation network and configured with Editor itself has errors that do not help us.

This is "original" state - the bugged one, tuned like that from original CTF-Glacier where Flags weren't having these implemented issues from CE105 (WC Edition if you ask me).
Initial_Stage.PNG
Initial_Stage.PNG (803.06 KiB) Viewed 5872 times
Continuing with BUG #2...
UncodeX Stuff
Not often maintained
My UT Mapping works...
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.
- Pablo Picasso -
Nelsona
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:03 am

Re: Map's Navigation Network - XC_PathsWorker & MapGarbage support

Post by Nelsona »

Error Number 2 is the path linking a LiftExit from the bottom to the End Point LiftCenter from Flag's platform and which has nothing in common with artificial intelligence in this case, because a LiftCenter has no special directives for a jump on height or on length using tools from Pawn's Inventory such as UT_JumpBoots or ImpactHammer or Translocator. We assume that this would have been a shorter escape way to the bottom, not for assaulting Flag.

XC_PathsWorker can do all sort of paths-connections. In this hypostasis we can connect a navigation point next to "LifterCenter" to it using a unidirectional path, preventing Pawn from doing lousy things.
The manual connection option can be successfully guaranteed if the possibility of movement between the two points is being tested first. We are using bTestReach option with these two navigation points selected.
Manual_Control1.PNG
Manual_Control1.PNG (1.15 MiB) Viewed 5868 times
The engine runs a "pointreachable" test and shows us the results of how high can be the creature capable of moving between the two points - and if this is possible.
Manual_Control2.PNG
Manual_Control2.PNG (1.05 MiB) Viewed 5868 times
Awesome ! This path can be very logic. Collision data is automatically copied to the "TempReachSpec" structure in which we need to specify "reachFlags". We can use R_Walk = 1.
Manual_Control3.PNG
Manual_Control3.PNG (1.15 MiB) Viewed 5867 times
The next Path/ReachSpec now needs a "Start" and an "End". These will be captured one by one using "bGetNodeA" having the selected pathnode and then "bGetNodeB" having "LiftCenter" selected. We ensure that bOneWay variable is set to True.
Manual_Control4.PNG
Manual_Control4.PNG (1.14 MiB) Viewed 5866 times
At this time we are putting on TRUE the variable "bConnectAtoB" because we use the Build button.
Manual_Control5.PNG
Manual_Control5.PNG (1019.35 KiB) Viewed 5864 times
The result goes as follows:
Manual_Control6.PNG
Manual_Control6.PNG (792.94 KiB) Viewed 5863 times
PathNode521 is now forced connected as One-Way to the LiftCenter3. LiftCenter actors are going connected by builder using 410 UU as hard-coded distance and not 500. I took this decision from here:
2DDistance.PNG
2DDistance.PNG (8.19 KiB) Viewed 5861 times
"LiftCenter" looks addicted to a 2DDistance of 400 UU - I said 410 UU...
UncodeX Stuff
Not often maintained
My UT Mapping works...
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.
- Pablo Picasso -
Nelsona
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:03 am

Re: Map's Navigation Network - XC_PathsWorker & MapGarbage support

Post by Nelsona »

Solution number 2.
This connection can be solved without a new ReachSpec defined as 1799. We can pick the useless bugger ReachSpec going from LiftExit to LiftCenter for giving it a navigation purpose.
This is another stage in which XC_PathsWorker has the power to move paths/reachSpecs elsewhere - bAutoMoveCDtoAB.
We collect the 4 variables one by one to initialize the moving-path process.
AutoMove1.PNG
AutoMove1.PNG (1.13 MiB) Viewed 5860 times
And now we have the result.
AutoMove2.PNG
AutoMove2.PNG (1.07 MiB) Viewed 5858 times
If we do not like the navigation path parameters in the new location, they can be changed because the index of this path was automatically copied to the "SpecIndex" variable - 1014 in this case. bModifySpec option can adjust a ReachSpec leaving it referenced in its location - we can change reachFlags or collision data. bAutoMoveCDtoAB does the other need by removing Path from old Place and placing it in the new place.
Here the route to the enemy flag from platform is null through Liftexit-LiftCenter-PathNode, but for return we have the path of course open - it can be tested. We can jump from the height, but we can not fly there - without special directives which a LiftCenter will not provide.
Technically speaking, the re-located path is used by smart creatures because it has R_Special = 32 as "reachFlag", but the parameters can be changed at any time according to the new requirements - it is not the case because the next link is also addressed to smart creatures - jumping down to LiftExit.
UncodeX Stuff
Not often maintained
My UT Mapping works...
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.
- Pablo Picasso -
Nelsona
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:03 am

Re: Map's Navigation Network - XC_PathsWorker & MapGarbage support

Post by Nelsona »

Chapter 3 - maps corrupted more or less accidentally.
Here navigation chain can be screwed up, remaining ReachSpecs are pointing nowhere causing a critical game crash.
When map has a special paths-build, we might not want to waste time re-doing entire work again. Bot Support can be somehow fixed here under 1 minute.
Entering the stage MapGarbage.
Navigation_Debug1.PNG
Navigation_Debug1.PNG (64.33 KiB) Viewed 5852 times
Ooops, indeed something it's missing and it's badly screwed up. In this moment we can report ReachSpecs with XC_PathsWorker - if we want to see them. Editor.log file can be renamed as a TEXT file and opened later in NotePad - we might want them used later.
Here is the report:
Navigation_Debug2.PNG
Navigation_Debug2.PNG (64.5 KiB) Viewed 5852 times
In next version of XC_PathsWorker we can have some clue about missing stuff. Either way something is wrong here:

Code: Select all

ReachSpec: 365 : Start = PathNode7 End = PathNode5 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = WALK Dist = 625 Pruned = 0.
ReachSpec: 366 : Start = PathNode7 End = PathNode22 ColRadius = 24 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = WALK Dist = 321 Pruned = 0.
ReachSpec: 367 : Start = None End = MyLevel.PlayerStart1 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 806 Pruned = 1.
ReachSpec: 368 : Start = None End = MyLevel.LiftExit1 ColRadius = 57 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 801 Pruned = 1.
ReachSpec: 369 : Start = None End = MyLevel.LiftExit2 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 401 Pruned = 0.
ReachSpec: 370 : Start = None End = MyLevel.LiftExit3 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 239 Pruned = 0.
ReachSpec: 371 : Start = None End = MyLevel.LiftExit4 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 803 Pruned = 1.
ReachSpec: 372 : Start = None End = MyLevel.PlayerStart7 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 196 Pruned = 0.
ReachSpec: 373 : Start = None End = MyLevel.PlayerStart8 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 918 Pruned = 0.
ReachSpec: 374 : Start = None End = MyLevel.PathNode3 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 479 Pruned = 1.
ReachSpec: 375 : Start = None End = MyLevel.PathNode4 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 341 Pruned = 1.
ReachSpec: 376 : Start = None End = MyLevel.PathNode5 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 767 Pruned = 1.
ReachSpec: 377 : Start = None End = MyLevel.PathNode6 ColRadius = 57 ColHeight = 44 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 888 Pruned = 0.
ReachSpec: 378 : Start = None End = MyLevel.PathNode9 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 720 Pruned = 0.
ReachSpec: 379 : Start = None End = MyLevel.PathNode11 ColRadius = 64 ColHeight = 47 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 909 Pruned = 0.
ReachSpec: 380 : Start = None End = MyLevel.PathNode12 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 498 Pruned = 1.
ReachSpec: 381 : Start = None End = MyLevel.PathNode13 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 592 Pruned = 1.
ReachSpec: 382 : Start = None End = MyLevel.PathNode29 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 679 Pruned = 1.
ReachSpec: 383 : Start = None End = MyLevel.InventorySpot10 ColRadius = 50 ColHeight = 44 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 201 Pruned = 0.
ReachSpec: 384 : Start = None End = MyLevel.InventorySpot38 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 377 Pruned = 1.
ReachSpec: 385 : Start = None End = MyLevel.InventorySpot39 ColRadius = 57 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = 9 Dist = 347 Pruned = 0.
ReachSpec: 386 : Start = PathNode9 End = PlayerStart1 ColRadius = 70 ColHeight = 70 ReachFlag = WALK Dist = 166 Pruned = 0.
From 367 to 385 we do have some "NONE" actor referenced in ReachSpecs which are still placed into navigation network - this stage is the game crusher.

All right, let's apply some fixing.
#1 UnLink navigation chain with MapGarbage.
Navigation_Debug3.PNG
Navigation_Debug3.PNG (10.53 KiB) Viewed 5851 times
If we have lousy data concerning Zones for nodes and for preventing them from being a problem we can check-fix zoning data with option bCheckFixActorsZones.
Navigation_Debug4.PNG
Navigation_Debug4.PNG (83.64 KiB) Viewed 5851 times
All of them should be normal - nothing has needed any fix.
#2 We are re-linking Navigation Chain.
Navigation_Debug5.PNG
Navigation_Debug5.PNG (83.64 KiB) Viewed 5851 times
Right now navigation chain is normal having all Navigation Points connected - linked in chain.
#3 We defragment ReachSpecs with XC_PathsWorker - incomplete ReachSpecs will no longer be referenced in navigation chain.
Navigation_Debug6.PNG
Navigation_Debug6.PNG (96.18 KiB) Viewed 5850 times
Good, now map saved as an updated version it's no longer crashing Bot games - probably for MonsterHunt this is not an answer, but it worth trying this when map has more manual work which is time consuming for being reconfigured again.

HINT: Offending ReachSpecs can be re-used elsewhere in map by Editing them with XC_PathsWorker based on their "SpecIndex" and "TempReachSpec", then applying the defrag option. All valid ReachSpecs are remapped in Navigation Chain so we can recycle these debris data.
UncodeX Stuff
Not often maintained
My UT Mapping works...
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.
- Pablo Picasso -
Post Reply