Re: XCGE forum
Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:27 pm
Tick and Tock said the Clock.
I see people from all planet generally being in the house - with exceptions of course.
If we have some time I was wondering why we don't have any sort of update here because... I see that things are not exactly finished here, neither some replies at ut99.org and... that UT469 let's see that without to touch things directly, it's not very convincing to me about compatibility with things which I've done so far.
This silence is... interesting. If it was about a Discord discussion toward private stuff testing, I did not see any link to a whatever chat...
Good... At a moment community was not happy about EPIC's changes at UT versions, I'm curious what community is changing and how much old nice stuff is going down-hill here. Never mind... some day I'll setup another default server install without those "uber duber" XC accelerators - yesterday I was really disappointed about some navigation stuff which I wrote and proving as being less useful in XC_Engine - it was working but not all the time. Each old version has some borks which were disturbing in a point. Each or these points motivated people to not use it, maybe it's time to slow down this XC toy and... setting up a default stock as it should (more exactly as I consider).
In other hand I might go full latent and not moving a finger at codes. Reason ? If new update breaks all NavAdder and other of my work, then it's all a waste of time. If XC won't have an update any more as a backup in case of an UT469 funky problem - I'll see that, once again doesn't worth doing anything. Test version 24b was the latest one and... bugged as well, and then perhaps I'll spend time with some old maps leaving away mods because at this moment I don't have any route to follow.
Perhaps UT469 will be ready when I'll have 70 years old and 10 years of Covid isolation...
I see people from all planet generally being in the house - with exceptions of course.
If we have some time I was wondering why we don't have any sort of update here because... I see that things are not exactly finished here, neither some replies at ut99.org and... that UT469 let's see that without to touch things directly, it's not very convincing to me about compatibility with things which I've done so far.
This silence is... interesting. If it was about a Discord discussion toward private stuff testing, I did not see any link to a whatever chat...
Good... At a moment community was not happy about EPIC's changes at UT versions, I'm curious what community is changing and how much old nice stuff is going down-hill here. Never mind... some day I'll setup another default server install without those "uber duber" XC accelerators - yesterday I was really disappointed about some navigation stuff which I wrote and proving as being less useful in XC_Engine - it was working but not all the time. Each old version has some borks which were disturbing in a point. Each or these points motivated people to not use it, maybe it's time to slow down this XC toy and... setting up a default stock as it should (more exactly as I consider).
In other hand I might go full latent and not moving a finger at codes. Reason ? If new update breaks all NavAdder and other of my work, then it's all a waste of time. If XC won't have an update any more as a backup in case of an UT469 funky problem - I'll see that, once again doesn't worth doing anything. Test version 24b was the latest one and... bugged as well, and then perhaps I'll spend time with some old maps leaving away mods because at this moment I don't have any route to follow.
Perhaps UT469 will be ready when I'll have 70 years old and 10 years of Covid isolation...